Skip Navigation   US Department of Health and Human Services Organdonor.gov
blank
Questions
Terms and Topics
About This Site
blank
 
   
Home   Home Be a donor Donation Basics Transplantation Basics Reduce the Risk Research Get Involved   Get Involved

HRSA Transplant Center Growth and Management Collaborative: Best Practices Evaluation Report - September 2007

     
HRSA Transplant Center Growth and Management Collaborative:
Best Practices Evaluation

Printer-Friendly Report
(717 KB)
Adobe Acrobat graphic with link to free Adobe Acrobat Reader download site
Introduction
Study Design and Methodology
Strategy/Driver 1: Institutional Vision and Commitment
Strategy/Driver 2: Dedicated Team
Strategy/Driver 3: Agressive Clinical Style
Strategy/Driver 4: Patient and Family Centered Care
Strategy/Driver 5: Financial Intelligence
Strategy/Driver 6: Aggressive Management of Performance Outcomes
Implementation Considerations
Conclusions
Appendix A - Change Package Document
Appendix B - List of Expert Panelists
Appendix C - Transplant Center and Program
Acknowledgements
  X. CONCLUSIONS

Site visits to 15 transplant centers and 34 organ programs revealed six strategies/drivers and 23 accompanying key change concepts that appear to be associated with high performance in organ acceptance, transplantation, and outcomes. Many of these strategies/drivers and key change concepts are interrelated.

For most of the high-performing transplant centers visited, a critical success factor has been the vision and commitment of their hospitals’ leadership to making transplantation an institutional priority and to assuring the necessary resources and infrastructure to grow their transplant programs. At some of the centers, transplant programs have grown directly as a result of the executive leadership’s decision to seek out innovative and committed transplant surgeon and physician leaders and providing them with the necessary resources to achieve transplant growth. At other centers, transplant program administrators and clinical leaders have gained institutional support by first building a case for the value of transplant services to both the hospital and patients. In either case, organ transplantation has been established as a strategic priority at all of these centers, and significant investments in staffing and other resources have been made to facilitate growth of the transplant programs.

Another critical success factor of the 15 high-performing transplant centers is the existence of a collaborative and rewarding work environment that attracts and retains highly dynamic, committed, and skilled specialists in transplantation. Across all of the centers visited, transplant teams are led by proactive and committed surgeons and physicians who are aligned with the institution’s vision to build and grow the transplant program. However, in order to be successful, these surgeons and physicians need to be supported by a highly specialized and dedicated multi-disciplinary team of nurses, coordinators, social workers, financial managers and coordinators, medical specialists (e.g., infectious disease physicians, anesthesiologists, etc.), administrative staff, and allied health staff. Each team member possesses a unique set of skills, expertise, and knowledge that is needed to effectively manage patients and to provide high quality patient care.

Given the perpetual shortage of organs, aggressive patient and organ acceptance practices are critical components for optimizing transplant growth and volume, while maintaining expected or higher than expected patient and graft survival outcomes. Across the centers visited, evidence-based practices are employed to create a high threshold for rejecting less than optimal organ offers (including ECD and DCD organs), as well as higher-risk recipients. This aggressive approach also applies to patient evaluation and management while on the waitlist. By actively marketing their high quality transplant programs among patients, referring physicians in the community, OPOs, and payers, these centers are able to build and grow their transplant waitlists to an optimal size that allows them to effectively identify appropriate donor-recipient matches for every viable organ offer and to achieve increased transplant volume and growth, without sacrificing patient and graft outcomes.

In an effort to provide the best possible care to every patient and family everyday, the high-performing transplant centers visited have established institution-wide practices, systems, and mechanisms to organize care around the needs of patients and families. By looking at the transplant process through the patient lens, these centers have identified ways to make the entire transplant process easier and less stressful for both patients and their families. Centers have accomplished this by removing patient access barriers and streamlining staff workflow to provide more efficient care; providing patients and their families with a high level of education and support throughout the transplant process so that they have the information to make informed decisions about their care; and by creating a family-friendly, “normal” environment in order to make patients and their families feel at home while at the hospital for extended periods of time.

Achieving and maintaining transplant program financial strength has been another critical success factor of the high-performing transplant centers visited. Centers have employed various strategies including having a detailed understanding of program finances, sound financial management, and excellent payer relations. Financial staff at centers actively track and monitor their program finances and payer reimbursement mechanisms, negotiate payer contracts with rates that are based on transplant program actual costs and patient resource use, develop constructive and mutually beneficial relationships with payers, and provide transplant-specific financial counseling and coordination to patients and their families.

Finally, all of the transplant centers visited optimize their performance by aggressively monitoring and managing their program performance outcomes. From pre-, peri-, to post-transplant care, protocols are used to deliver standardized, efficient, and high quality care. In addition, all of the centers visited engage in clinical research both to advance the field of transplantation and to improve patient outcomes. By being on the cutting edge of research and innovative practices, these centers are able to foster transplant volume and growth by attracting patients and payers. Lastly, all of the centers visited regularly collect and review data on various transplant program outcome measures and use the data to identify problem areas and to implement appropriate process improvement strategies.

US Department of Health & Human Services