| |
|
I. INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has
devoted considerable effort to achieving increased organ donation
and transplantation rates by developing public awareness campaigns
and identifying and replicating organ procurement organization
(OPO), donor hospital, and transplant center best practices.
Between 1995 and 2006, there was a 67percent increase in organ
donors for all donor types from 8,854 to 14,756.13
During this time, organ transplants also increased from 19,393
to 28,932, an increase of over 49 percent.14
Combined, these data indicate an important upward trend in
both organ donation and transplantation in the United States.
Despite this trend toward increased numbers of organ donors
and transplants, a disparity remains between the demand for
and supply of donor organs. Currently, there are more than
96,827 patients waiting for an organ transplantation in the
United States.15
Further, of those on the waiting list, each day 79 will receive
a life-saving organ transplantation, and 17 individuals die
waiting.16,
17 Although
there were over 4,500 organ donors and over 9,200 transplants
between January and April of 2007, the gap between the supply
of and demand for donor organs still remains.18, 19
HHS’s Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
is committed to addressing this unmet need and has done so
by implementing several initiatives. Two recent initiatives,
the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative and the Organ
Transplantation Breakthrough Collaborative, have identified
“breakthrough” best practices that are associated with increases
in organ donation and transplantation in high-performing OPOs,
hospitals, and transplant centers.20,
21
Together, the Organ Donation and Transplantation Breakthrough
Collaboratives have resulted in an increase in the number
of deceased donors and in organ availability. For example,
in the 1st year of the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative,
organ donation increased by 10.8 percent in the United States.22
Other initiatives, such as The Workplace Partnership for Life,
Strengthening Donor Registries, and the Driver’s Education
Curriculum have also served to increase organ donation consent
rates by educating the public about organ donation.
As these and other initiatives assist in increasing the supply
of donor organs and the number of organs transplanted per
donor, HRSA now seeks to identify and spread the best practices
of transplant centers that are quickly adapting to the increased
supply of donor organs by achieving high organ transplantation
rates, while maintaining expected or higher than expected
patient and graft survival outcomes. By identifying and spreading
these best practices, HRSA intends to help transplant programs
across the country effectively grow. An investigation into
current and emerging practices that influence a transplant
center’s ability to increase acceptance and transplantation
rates of organs, while maintaining expected or higher than
expected outcomes can significantly improve the number of
successful transplants performed in the United States.
This report presents observations of the best practices
of selected high-performing transplant centers that have achieved
high organ transplantation rates and efficiency in recovered
organ use, while maintaining expected or higher than expected
patient and graft survival outcomes. Section II describes
the study design and methodology, including site selection,
data collection and synthesis, and study limitations. Sections
III-VIII present the study findings, grouped by the six strategies/drivers
of the Change Package Document (see Appendix
A). The strategies/drivers represent the best practices
associated with high performance in organ acceptance, transplantation,
and outcomes identified on the site visits to 15 high-performing
transplant centers. Each of these sections includes a description
of the key change concepts and action items that correspond
with the strategy/driver, as well as examples of how the action
items are being implemented at 15 transplant centers across
the country. Section IX discusses implementation considerations
for the six strategies/drivers, and Section X presents the
conclusion of the report.
13Donors
recovered in US by donor type. Richmond, VA: Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network (not a U.S. Government
Web site), 2007. Accessed July 9, 2007.
14Transplant
by Donor Type. Richmond, VA: Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network (not a U.S. Government
Web site), 2007. Accessed July 9, 2007.
15Waiting
List Candidates. Richmond, VA: Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network (not a U.S. Government
Web site), 2007. Accessed July 9, 2007.
16Transplants
by Donor Type. Richmond, VA: Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network (not a U.S. Government
Web site), 2007. Accessed July 9, 2007.
17Removal
Reasons by Year. Richmond, VA: Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network (not a U.S. Government
Web site), 2007. Accessed July 9, 2007. http://www.optn.org/latestData/rptData.asp.
18Donors
recovered in US by donor type. Richmond, VA: Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network (not a U.S. Government
Web site), 2007. Accessed July 9, 2007.
19Transplant
by Donor Type. Richmond, VA: Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network (not a U.S. Government
Web site), 2007. Accessed July 9, 2007.
20The
Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative: Best Practices.
The Lewin Group, 2003
21The
Organ Transplantation Breakthrough Collaborative: Best Practices
Evaluation. The Lewin Group, 2005.
22Burdick,
J. Memo
to ASTS membership: Organ Transplantation Breakthrough
Collaborative. Health Resources and Services Administration,
June 17, 2005. Accessed July 19, 2006. |